#Intro flash multimedia professional
Local websites must enlist a Flash professional to translate content. Internationalization and localization is complicated.In general, Flash integrates poorly with search. The "Find in page" feature does not work.Flash reduces accessibility for users with disabilities.
![intro flash multimedia intro flash multimedia](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/thzvstBTOuE/maxresdefault.jpg)
Users are thus forced to read text in the designer-specified font size, which is almost always too small since designers tend to have excellent vision.
![intro flash multimedia intro flash multimedia](https://cyber.olympiadsuccess.com/assets/images/cyber_square/C08FLA1.jpg)
In the future, multimedia features may well be better integrated with browsers and thus these problems will be solved. The second set of issues relates to the very notion of using a plug-in rather than standard Web technology. The problem is simply that current Flash design tends to encourage abuse. You can design usable multimedia objects that comply with the guidelines and are easy to use. None of these usability problems are inherent in Flash. Deviate, and you reduce their feeling of environmental mastery. When you use standards, users can focus on content and their reasons for visiting your site.
#Intro flash multimedia how to
They know how to operate the standard widget. And, even if the new design was workable, it would still reduce a site's overall usability because users would have to figure out how it worked. A new scrollbar designed over the weekend is likely to get many details wrong.
#Intro flash multimedia windows
The current Macintosh and Windows scrollbars emerged after the world's best interaction designers worked for years testing numerous design alternatives. However, the specification of a new GUI widget is a major human-factors exercise. How many scrollbar designs do we need? Actually, we probably do need a new scrollbar design for online content the current scrollbar was designed for office automation content that users wrote themselves. Third, many Flash designers introduce their own nonstandard GUI controls. Websites that force users to sit through sequences with nothing to do will be boring and pacifying, regardless of how cool they look. Unfortunately, many Flash designers decrease the granularity of user control and revert to presentation styles that resemble television rather than interactive media. This quality is what makes the Web so usable, despite its many usability problems. Users go where they want, when they want. Second, one of the Web's most powerful features is that it lets users control their own destiny.
![intro flash multimedia intro flash multimedia](https://live.staticflickr.com/8168/7389433502_eea3d0d051_c.jpg)
However, as my 1995 guidelines discuss, that place is limited. However, their very existence encourages design abuse in several ways.įirst, Flash encourages gratuitous animation: Since we can make things move, why not make things move? Animation clearly has its place in online communication.
![intro flash multimedia intro flash multimedia](https://slideplayer.com/13/4159910/big_thumb.jpg)
On the upside, most Flash intros feature a "skip intro" button. However, we're now seeing the rise of Flash intros that have the same obnoxious effect: They delay users' ability to get what they came for. Luckily, almost all professional websites have removed this usability barrier. Splash pages were an early sin of abusive Web design. In most cases, we would be better off if these multimedia objects were removed.įlash tends to degrade websites for three reasons: it encourages design abuse, it breaks with the Web's fundamental interaction principles, and it distracts attention from the site's core value. Although there are rare occurrences of good Flash design (it even adds value on occasion), the use of Flash typically lowers usability. About 99% of the time, the presence of Flash on a website constitutes a usability disease.